We noticed that you're using an unsupported browser. The TripAdvisor website may not display properly.
We support the following browsers:
Windows: Internet Explorer, Mozilla Firefox, Google Chrome. Mac: Safari.

“don't stay here” 1 of 5 stars
Review of Glendale Hyde Park Hotel

Save Saved
You added Glendale Hyde Park Hotel to your Saves list
Best prices for your stay
Enter dates for best prices
Check In mm/dd/yyyy Check Out mm/dd/yyyy
Show Prices
Compare best prices from top travel sites
and 8 more sites!
Glendale Hyde Park Hotel
2.5 of 5 Hotel   |   8 Devonshire Terrace, London W2 3DN, England (Bayswater / Notting Hill / Lancaster Gate )   |  
Hotel amenities
Ranked #896 of 1,073 hotels in London
australia
Senior Contributor
22 reviews 22 reviews
16 hotel reviews
Reviews in 17 cities Reviews in 17 cities
9 helpful votes 9 helpful votes
“don't stay here”
1 of 5 stars Reviewed July 4, 2013

this hotel if you can call a hotel is the worst place that i have ever stayed in, the female front manager was so rude to both my wife and i the rooms so tiny you could not swing a cat in and filthy filthy,the breakfast room is in the dungeon with only a few tables, we ate elsewhere for breakfast.
there are other hotels nearby so my suggestion is to do a walk in and check out the room first.

Room Tip: don't stay here
See more room tips
  • Stayed June 2013, traveled as a couple
    • 1 of 5 stars Value
    • 3 of 5 stars Location
    • 1 of 5 stars Sleep Quality
    • 1 of 5 stars Rooms
    • 1 of 5 stars Cleanliness
    • 1 of 5 stars Service
Was this review helpful? Yes 2
This review is the subjective opinion of a TripAdvisor member and not of TripAdvisor LLC.
Write a Review

146 people have reviewed this hotel

Traveler rating
    5
    26
    29
    30
    56
See reviews for
15
48
11
7
Rating summary
  • Location
    4 of 5 stars
  • Sleep Quality
    2.5 of 5 stars
  • Rooms
    2 of 5 stars
  • Service
    2.5 of 5 stars
  • Value
    2.5 of 5 stars
  • Cleanliness
    2.5 of 5 stars
Traveler tips help you choose the right room.   Room tips (6)
Date | Rating
  • Dutch first
  • English first
  • French first
  • German first
  • Greek first
  • Italian first
  • Japanese first
  • Norwegian first
  • Portuguese first
  • Russian first
  • Spanish first
  • Swedish first
  • Any
English first
1 review
1 helpful vote 1 helpful vote
1 of 5 stars Reviewed June 30, 2013 via mobile

I could not believe how bad this hotel is. A double room and not even 18 in of space round the bed. No space for furniture in the room. Shower was dirty and the sink had no plug. £200 a might for such a tiny room and so filthy on the too floor. I have stayed in a room as bad as this before but was in rural Africa and cost £10 per night and I felt sorry for the poverty stricken folk trying to make a living renting out such rooms. To pay so much in London was outrageous. When we complained they gave us a room exactly the same size and a bit cleaner on the second floor. Although this new one had a plug in the sink, but a plug in a sink is still not worth £200 a night. Disgusting.

  • Stayed June 2013
    • 3 of 5 stars Location
    • 1 of 5 stars Rooms
    • 1 of 5 stars Cleanliness
    • 1 of 5 stars Service
Was this review helpful? Yes 1
This review is the subjective opinion of a TripAdvisor member and not of TripAdvisor LLC.
Plymouth, United Kingdom
2 reviews
Reviews in 2 cities Reviews in 2 cities
1 helpful vote 1 helpful vote
1 of 5 stars Reviewed June 15, 2013

The rooms looked nothing like on the internet but that isnt really much of a surprise but I would have expected better than it was. No matter how cheap or expensive it is still a customer's money being spent.
The entance is misleading and they have cleverly used mirrors to give the impression of a large reception area which adds to the 'online' impression that the 'hotel' is a large and selubrious establishment.

The standard is not up to scratch. I could have grouted and finished the shower and bathroom areas to a much higher standard myself. Some of the grout was dirty and had a culmination of soap. In the first room we stayed in there was no plug in the sink and when on the toilet you almost had your head in the sink and could bang your elbow on the door handle. The shower cubicle was high up and I am sure breaches health and safety regulations. There was just enough room for the width of your legs between the two beds and suitcases had to be stored in front of the exit door. This not spacially suitable. To say they were refurbished 3 years ago is unbelievable to accept.

When we arrived we were told there were two rooms available, one in the basement and one on the top. We did not realise there were 80 stairs to the room at the top and the stairway (which I noticed was filthy as it was wrought iron and not cleaned along the bottom) got narrower with a heavy door at the bottom of one set of stairs. I think there were four rooms squashed in on that top floor. In addition there were more stairs down to the 'cooked breakfast' in the basement.

My fear was how to escape in the event of a fire. A fire escape on the ground floor and the basement is certainly not adequate especially given the cramped rooms and stairs at the top. I find it unbelievable that a fire and safety officer would have allowed that. When told the room was on the fourth floor we did not expect there to be so many stairs. My house is on three floors and has approximately 22 stairs but it was the 'zig zag' layout in the hotel which required the 80 stairs.
My friend asked if she could see the other room in the basement but she reported back to me that it was no larger and was very dark. She asked if there was another room and was told there would be one on the first floor the following day. So the next morning we packed our luggage ready to be moved.
We were not late for breakfast on the first morning and were there at the same time as many other guests so thankgoodness not all the guests arrived for breakfast at the same time. 'Cooked' breakfast was a 'do-it-yourself' job and many guests were outside in the yard on wooden garden furniture under canvas with patio heaters. Breakfast consisted of tea, coffee, orange juice toast, jam/marmalade, cheese, ham, cornflakes and boiled eggs.

Later that evening when we returned to the hotel we went to the room on the first floor. This was still up two flights of stairs but of course much better than the other room. The bathroom was larger and had a proper shower cubicle. Again the 'finishing' of the grouting etc was not up to standard and was not clean. The mirror above the sink was so low that you had to crouch down to use it.
The window to the room (beyond which was a balcony with no indication as to whether it was safe to step out onto or not) opened upwards but there was nothing to secure it so we had to use plastic water bottles in order to allow air into the room.

The hairdrier and holster was located above the plastic shelf for the kettle so in order to use the kettle the hairdrier had to be removed from the holster and left to dangle below...but even worse there was no socket in which to plug the kettle. When my friend went to reception to ask they said there was an extension under the bed. There was and was used for the bedside lamp. If you look at the photos you will see yet another health and safety breach with the extension lead dangling in the air and the lead across the floor. This is NOT acceptable. The milk consisted of powered sachets-yuk!

Again our suitcases had to be positioned in front of the doorway/exit.

The following morning we had to be at breakfast early due to planes and coaches to catch. The receptionist had said the cleaners would be there or to go to reception to have the breakfast area opened up. No one was there so we asked for the room to be opened up. I refused to have a cup of tea as I guessed the water was there from the morning before and had probably been boiled again and again. The bowl of eggs were put out but then removed and returned a couple of minutes later with water on them...had yesterday's been warmed up? Who knows.

The door down to the breakfast room had stairs immediately behind it. Again something that could have been a potential accident. There was no sign warning guests of this.

This hotel has too many rooms crammed in for it to be safe and comfortable for guests. Health and Safety officers should be reprimanded if they have passed this hotel on inspection.

The hotel is described as economical....'economical' with the truth maybe. Premier Inn for example are considered basic and 'economical' but at least they are of a higher standard than the Glendale Hyde Park Hotel.

The 'standard' or lack of, the health and safety issues along with the attempt to get as many guests into such a small premises is appalling. I dread to think how 29 guests would have evacuated the building in an emergency and am relieved that not all the guests arrived for breakfast at the same time.

I am embarrassed to think that my friend had visited from Germany and had thought she had booked one of the the better hotels in the area and had decided to treat me to a couple of days away and it was like Fawlty Towers...in fact worse...we would have laughed had it not been so bad.

  • Stayed May 2013, traveled with friends
    • 1 of 5 stars Value
    • 4 of 5 stars Location
    • 2 of 5 stars Sleep Quality
    • 1 of 5 stars Rooms
    • 1 of 5 stars Cleanliness
    • 1 of 5 stars Service
Was this review helpful? Yes 1
This review is the subjective opinion of a TripAdvisor member and not of TripAdvisor LLC.
Stuttgart, Germany
1 review
1 of 5 stars Reviewed June 3, 2013

Don't book at that hotel, because the rooms especially the showers are not in the condition as shown online.
One of the top rooms is 80 steps away from the reception, no lift at all.
In the morning you have to wait until you can finish having a shower and the breakfast room is in the cellar, very tiny and really simple, only toast, butter, marmelade, cheese and eggs. No fruit, no yogurth !
It is the money you have to pay not worth.

  • Stayed May 2013, traveled with friends
    • 1 of 5 stars Value
    • 3 of 5 stars Location
    • 1 of 5 stars Sleep Quality
    • 1 of 5 stars Rooms
    • 1 of 5 stars Cleanliness
    • 2 of 5 stars Service
Was this review helpful? Yes
This review is the subjective opinion of a TripAdvisor member and not of TripAdvisor LLC.
Buenos Aires, Distrito Federal, Argentina
Reviewer
3 reviews 3 reviews
3 hotel reviews
Reviews in 3 cities Reviews in 3 cities
4 of 5 stars Reviewed May 13, 2013

It was a nice hotel is not that bad as people say, if you only look to sleep and dont expect that much this is very nice and not that expensive, we had a little fridge in the room, a coffe machhine, glasses the shower was excellent and comfy beds. The recepcionists are very nice and helpful! always smiling! good vibe. With the tube very close and supermarkets very close as well. The Wi Fi although we pay it was terrible.

  • Stayed May 2013, traveled with family
    • 3 of 5 stars Value
    • 5 of 5 stars Location
    • 4 of 5 stars Sleep Quality
    • 3 of 5 stars Cleanliness
    • 5 of 5 stars Service
Was this review helpful? Yes
This review is the subjective opinion of a TripAdvisor member and not of TripAdvisor LLC.
Melbourne, Australia
Senior Reviewer
10 reviews 10 reviews
6 hotel reviews
Reviews in 8 cities Reviews in 8 cities
4 helpful votes 4 helpful votes
2 of 5 stars Reviewed April 28, 2013

Tiny room, tiny bed, tiny closet, tiny everything! We are not big people and only had one bag each and we found it very uncomfortable. It was clean and in a good location, however I am sure you can get more for you money.

  • Stayed April 2013, traveled as a couple
    • 2 of 5 stars Value
    • 4 of 5 stars Location
    • 2 of 5 stars Sleep Quality
    • 2 of 5 stars Rooms
    • 5 of 5 stars Cleanliness
    • 3 of 5 stars Service
Was this review helpful? Yes 1
This review is the subjective opinion of a TripAdvisor member and not of TripAdvisor LLC.
Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Reviewer
5 reviews 5 reviews
3 hotel reviews
Reviews in 3 cities Reviews in 3 cities
2 helpful votes 2 helpful votes
2 of 5 stars Reviewed April 11, 2013

The twin room was very small, draughtful, but the matras was descent.
You have to make shift with the small bathroom.
The breakfastroom was so small - only 3 tables - for people to sit. People were standing to eat their very basic breakfast (bread, jelly, ham, cheese, boiled eggs, cornflakes, coffee, tea, juice and milk)
Lancaster Gate underground (central line) and Hyde Park is a 5-10 minute walk.
Convenient stores around the corner.

  • Stayed April 2013, traveled with friends
    • 2 of 5 stars Value
    • 3 of 5 stars Location
    • 2 of 5 stars Sleep Quality
    • 1 of 5 stars Rooms
    • 3 of 5 stars Cleanliness
    • 3 of 5 stars Service
Was this review helpful? Yes
This review is the subjective opinion of a TripAdvisor member and not of TripAdvisor LLC.
Hotels you might also like...
mm/dd/yyyy mm/dd/yyyy
Price Your Stay

Been to Glendale Hyde Park Hotel? Share your experiences!

Write a Review Add Photos & Videos

Additional Information about Glendale Hyde Park Hotel

Address: 8 Devonshire Terrace, London W2 3DN, England
Location: United Kingdom > England > London > Bayswater / Notting Hill / Lancaster Gate 
Amenities:
Hotel Style:
Ranked #896 of 1,073 hotels in London
Price Range (Based on Average Rates): $$
Hotel Class:2.5 star — Glendale Hyde Park Hotel 2.5*
Reservation Options:
TripAdvisor is proud to partner with Hotels.com, Travelocity, Priceline, Booking.com, Tingo, EasyToBook, BookingOdigeoWL, HotelsClick, Venere and Expedia so you can book your Glendale Hyde Park Hotel reservations with confidence. We help millions of travelers each month to find the perfect hotel for both vacation and business trips, always with the best discounts and special offers.
Also Known As:
Glendale Hyde Park London
Hotel Glendale Hyde Park
Glendale Hyde Park Hotel London, England

Owners: What's your side of the story?

If you own or manage Glendale Hyde Park Hotel, register now for free tools to enhance your listing, attract new reviews, and respond to reviewers.