We noticed that you're using an unsupported browser. The TripAdvisor website may not display properly.
We support the following browsers: Windows: Internet Explorer, Mozilla Firefox. Mac: Safari.

Galapagos Islands

Free Newsletter

Interested in Galapagos Islands?

We'll send you updates with the latest deals, reviews and articles for Galapagos Islands each week.

Galapagos Islands Forum: Notes from Land-Based Tour using Surtrek

rakishah
6 forum posts
 Notes from Land-Based Tour using Surtrek 

We just got back from a 12 day land based cruise using Surtrek out of Quito - and we had a marvelous time. Thought I would share our experience...

First-If possible, I would try to go land vs boat. As many have discussed on other forums, its much better for the local economy versus cruises ($ goes to mainland or foreign owners). You also can do more on each island, have way more flexibility, and judging from the bumpiness of our boat transfers, I don't think I would have enjoyed 8 days on a boat. Plus, we wanted a more active vacation, so land-based lends better.

Surtrek: I researched quite a bit, and this was the best level of service and price that I found. Some took forever to get back to you (had to go through middlemen) and others just wanted you to buy an 8 day cruise. Veronica at Suretrek went above and beyond the call of duty. We really customized our trip so I was in contact with them daily for a couple of weeks. During the trip, she called regularly to make sure we were having a good time and gave instructions to our hotels. We were able to change some daily activities, but I would warn that it's generally difficult to do so if you prepay. Suretrek was the most cost effective I found (unless you found hotels, tours, airfare on your own), and offered the highest level of customization. Much cheaper than cruise, and I felt better for our needs. If you use them, ask for Veronica!!

Hotels: We stayed at Miconia (San Cristobal), La Casa De Marita (Isabella), and Angermeyer Waterfront Inn (Santa Cruz). All in all, pretty good. La Casa i think was a bit overrated (theres several good places on the island), and Waterfront was by far our favorite.

Tour Operators: We really liked Sharsky in San Cristobal (young crew, very accomodating). Hotel San Vincente we were not too happy with (caution their loose definition of the term "bilingual"), but they seemed to be the only game in town. Scuba Iguana was great in terms of the dive/snorkel tours and guides themselves, but so-so when it came to booking other 3rd party tours. Overall - we were pretty happy with them.

Hope this helps - we had a wonderful time. Let me know if you have any questions during your vacation planning...

6 replies
Paris, France
576 forum posts
1. Re: Notes from Land-Based Tour using Surtrek
Destination Expert   What's this?
for Galapagos Islands

I have a reputation of being "anti land based", and don't deny it. And to be transparent, I also run a small Galapagos travel agency, focusing exclusively on cruises (by choice, not by necessity, as I could also be promoting land based packages just as easily).

Just a few precisions: the ride was bumpy for you on the boat, because land based tour operators ferry you to other islands on smaller, faster boats (20-25 knots), resulting of course in more bumpy wave action than on a typical cruise ship (8-10 knots).

As for the local economy, it is recognized by all conservation authorities in the islands, on the mainland, and worldwide (including the United Nations) that the greatest threat to Galapagos stems from the incredible population growth. Land based tourism means more hotels (indeed, you name hotels that weren't there 5 years ago), restaurants, bars, construction workers etc... which turn Galapagos into an employment centre for mainland Ecuadorians. 20% of the population in the islands is estimated as being without proper papers (immigration from the mainly is highly restricted), and they sent 1,000 such people back this year - indicating how bad this is. If land based tourism growth continues, it won't be long before Galapagos turns into an over-commercialized, overrun place looking more and more like any other destination, with the same old chain stores and hotels popping up. Already, a mainland fast food joint has recently opened up shop there.

Boat based visits do not lead to more land based hotels, etc... 75% of the Galapagos economy is already directly or indirectly driven by tourism (the rest is conservation, fishing, agriculture and government offices). Are the locals being kept out of this? Absolutely not - ships hire crew, maintenance people, office people on land, pay suppliers, mechanics etc....Many ship owners and operators are from the original families that settled the islands in the 1930s and 1940s, or earlier. The pressure for more land based tourism comes from a small group of entrepreneurs, often with continental partners, who want to build hotels.

Trust me, the money that operators of land based tours make goes just as much to the mainland, or to US banks, as does that of any other medium to large size business operator in the islands.

I don't deny that sitting in one place for a few days at a time gives you a different perspective on that place. I used to take short 3-4 day breaks from my work on Santa Cruz island by going to Isabela Island (Villamil) - it was very nice. But I continue to express my learned opinion that a cruise gives you a wider experience of what Galapagos is (an dispersed archipelago on the edge of the world - in the middle of nowhere) than spending time in a few non-descript (and often ratty, noisy) little towns.

Warmest regards,

Heather Blenkiron

Pigeon...
563 forum posts
2. Re: Notes from Land-Based Tour using Surtrek
Destination Expert   What's this?
for Pigeon Forge

Heather,

It's good to see you are finally admiting you have a finiancial interest in cruise style visits to the Galapagos Islands. You have sharpely criticized some here who have suggested, promoted or even answered questions about land based tours.

We all realize this board is a great place to seek and offer travel advice and we also know self advertising is not permitted. It's good to see you came clean. I hope you keep offering the good advice and continue to let people know you do operate a cruise company in the same place you are advising them about.

Chris

rakishah
6 forum posts
3. Re: Notes from Land-Based Tour using Surtrek

While I think that you may have some valid points, during our trip there, most locals commented on the down-sides of "cruise-based" versus land based tours.

The point of the post, however, was not to open up that debate - there are many other philosophical chat sessions that talk about it in detail. I certainly prefer the land-based tours, so I thought our experiece would be helpful to those who are considering the same.

Thanks.

4. Re: Notes from Land-Based Tour using Surtrek

-:- Message from TripAdvisor staff -:-

This post was determined to be inappropriate by the TripAdvisor community and has been removed.

To review the TripAdvisor Forums Posting Guidelines, please follow this link: http://www.tripadvisor.com/pages/forums_posting_guidelines.html

Our staff may also remove posts that do not follow our posting guidelines, and we reserve the right to remove any post for any reason. Thanks for being a part of the TripAdvisor travel community!

Removed on: 7:50 am, February 20, 2009
 
Durham, NH
5 forum posts
5. Re: Notes from Land-Based Tour using Surtrek

Thank you for your helpful comments. I get seasick and wondered if I would be able to get a feel for the Galapagos with a land based tour. You answered by questions.

lisa354@comcast.net

New Hampshire

LA
50 forum posts
6. Re: Notes from Land-Based Tour using Surtrek

i am just a recent visitor to the island and have no conflict of interests. i have to say i agree mostly with heather.

esp that, unless u r sea sick i would recommend cruise over land based anytime.

1) land-based does not really save you much money (and could be more costly on an $/sightseeing hour basis). it would be more costly if you factor into your time and the air-ticket to fly there

2) when docking, the sea is actually very calm. it is only rocky when it moves in the open seas. so if seasick makes you sleepy then i would recommend a cruise. only for those who cannot sleep on rough sea i would recommend land-based tours.

3) in a cruise, you go by a circle covering the different islands, for land-based, it would be a roundtrip to any other island. so it would be (almost) twice the amount of seasick and twice the energy/oil consumed (or greenhouse emission if you are into that, though personally i think global warming is a bit exaggerated, i am for using less gasoline in general)